http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=1261
By http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=3052
In yesterday’s Daily Telegraph there was an article entitled, “We want to offer Sharia Law to Britain.”
Sharia Law? Thank you, but, no thank you! We’ve managed without it for over 1,000 years, and see no reason to avail ourselves of this alien system just yet!
Indeed much of the content of this article was little more than http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=2792, stonings, amputations and beheadings carried out in hard-line Islamic states such as Saudi Arabia and Iran. Of course not, but only because they do not, as yet, have the power to torture and kill as they would wish, according to Sharia Law. A point confirmed by a member of the so called Muslim council of Britain, who is open in supporting the severe punishments meted out in countries where sharia law governs the country, i.e. cutting off the hands and feet, flogging the drunkard and fornicator, beheading apostates and deniers of Islam.The article quotes extensively from Dr Hasan al-Tourabi , spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain on issues of sharia law, who has been presiding over sharia courts in Britain for more than 25 years. Dr Hassan argues that British law would benefit from integrating aspects of Islamic personal law into the civil system, saying, “Whenever people associate the word Sharia with Muslims, they think it is flogging and stoning to death and cutting off the hand,” he says with a smile.
Dr Hassan is at pains to make the distinction between the aspects of law that sharia covers: worship, penal law, and personal law. Muslim leaders in Britain are interested only in integrating personal law, he says. Dr Hassan makes the distinction between the aspects of law that sharia covers: worship, penal law, and personal law, claiming that Muslim leaders in Britain are interested only in integrating personal law, and that anyway the form of Sharia practised in Britain is really quite benign. The same Dr Hassan has been parroting the same line since at least 1996
In a further quote from Dr Hassan, we are told, “Penal law is the duty of the Muslim state – it is not in the hands of any public institution like us to handle it. Only a Muslim government that believes in Islam is going to implement it. So there is no question of asking for penal law to be introduced here in the UK – that is out of the question.”
Out of the question? Oh really! What you have to understand is that in saying this the good Dr. is engaging in the sort of deception that he is told to use, by the Koran, when dealing with unbelievers. He no more believes that this statement is set in stone than does the BNP!
For according to the Prophet of Islam, “to lie is one of the major sins and Allah will hold you accountable, with the exception of these three” (in other words, in these three situations you can lie as much as you need to and Allah will not even blink): “(1) with your women; (2) in espionage jihad when you are a minority; and (3) in maintaining peace.” Thus the end justifies the means!
Bearing all this in mind, along comes the Telegraph, to educate us, or should we say, indoctrinate us. with many quotes from Dr Hassan (who comes from Sudan to lecture us about the joys of Sharia Law). To this end the Telegraph’s article gives these examples of “obligatory” Sharia Law:
• Food must be halal
• Personal hygiene must be of a very high standard
• Couples must have a full bath in flowing water after intercourse
• The body must be covered modestly
• Prayers must be said five times a day
• Believers must fast during Ramadan
Plus these “Strongly recommended” laws:
• Hands should be washed upon waking up (because one does not know where the hands have been during sleep)
• Eating should be done while seated
• The right hand should be used for eating and the left for cleaning oneself
• People should lie down on the right side when going to sleep
• The right shoe should be put on first, followed by the left
• The mouth and nose should be covered when yawning or sneezing
What a simple and innocent interpretation of Sharia we have here. What could possibly be wrong with such things? Not a lot if that really were all that was entailed. But it isn’t, and here the Telegraph is at its most willfully deceitful, for its editors and writers know the truth! What they peddle in so much of this article is an image that would be almost unrecognisable to anyone whom has lived in a country in which Sharia law is fully practised. You really have to wonder why.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/01/20/we-want-to-offer-sharia-law-to-britain/