Why are Barak Obama’s white supporters so enthusiastic? They are happily obeying.
By Frank Roman
During the decades preceding 2008, countless so-called “pro-white” or white nationalist activist groups here in the United States attempted to galvanize European American youth to be the racial advance guard of their people. Some of these entities worked tirelessly above board within the confines of the law for the sake of reaching a broad audience, while others were laughably cartoonish. Some unfortunately even committed heinous crimes against otherwise innocent people and institutions. Various segments of these groups were low key and thoughtful in their approach, some were middle of the road, while others were more raucous in their methods yet lawful; with all activists involved trying to promote the racial and cultural preservation of white Americans in the face of an encroaching demographic apocalypse. Some of these groups were religious based. Some were continental nationalists. Others described themselves as intellectual, while their counterparts referred to themselves as street level revolutionaries. Some of these groups were helpful while others simply were not.
Whether or not they considered themselves as Aryan-based, white nationalists, or even National Socialists they all used different vectors to carry a fundamentally similar message to the general population, hoping against hope their message would resonate “out there.” With the exception of bloodletting and violence, the message from all corners generally said the same thing: they were (and still are) analyzing certain racial and cultural destructive trends, articulated the outcome of those trends, and then attempted to warn their kinsmen while seeking to organize on their people’s behalf. Though I believe some of their methods and their rhetoric may have obscured their mission, from what I can tell many white advocacy groups in the preceding decades – say from 1950 onward — were at least fairly rational and articulate in their outreach — if only one was given the chance to objectively look below the surface. I also think that there were enough periods of time wherein white advocacy groups were numerous enough – and active enough– to appeal to an audience of varying receptivity, including those we today would consider being our elders, with the common sense to separate candid inspiring information from emotionally driven political train wrecks.
This brings me to my point: today we are in the position where the very real possibility of a president looms over our nation in the person of Barak Obama; “a biracial George McGovern, offering the same humdrum, big government liberalism pushed by the Left since the Great Society”. Barack Mohammad Hussein Obama born August 4, 1961 to a Kenyan father and a European derived mother is the junior United States Senator from Illinois and a leading candidate for the Democratic nomination in the 2008 presidential election. He is the fifth black Senator in U.S. history, and the only black currently “serving” in the U.S. Senate. “As a child, Obama had spent time in the neighborhood’s Islamic center. His former Roman Catholic and Muslim teachers, along with two people who were identified by Obama’s grade-school teacher as childhood friends, say Obama was registered by his family as a Muslim at both of the schools he attended.” He served in the Illinois Senate from 1997 to 2004, launching his campaign for U.S. Senate in 2003.So do you mean to tell me after all these years subsequent to plentiful European American advocating by countless groups that fought –for better or for worse– on behalf of their nation and kin that absolutely no part of the message got through; that it was all for nothing; that today’s youth who are the charges of the elders who were exposed to the messages described above still consider Barak Mohammad Hussein Obama as a viable candidate for president because he’s a ‘rock star?’ Do you mean to tell me that in spite of the fact he has yet to articulate one single substantive idea for making “a change we can believe in” millions of our people who I must call my kinsmen are still going to vote for him? Does the fact that a Hawaiian-born son of a Kenyan father and a white mother, who grew up in Indonesia with a name that any terrorist would be proud of and spawns such open excitement prove that the so-called white “extremists” of bygone days were right? Of course, I will be the first to admit some of these alleged white advocacy groups in days gone by actually hurt themselves and their cause because of some of their actions and their counterproductive rhetoric. But in spite of that how can it be possible that the underlying message has been so utterly lost upon the perceptions of today’s (majority) voting population? Clearly, some racial some may have found objectionable were never given the benefit of the doubt and examined more closely. Now don’t get me wrong. I have said before that we can detect a shift in the thinking of European Americans in terms of racial identity if we read between the lines, if we can ignore the din of the media’s double-think. A great many people are awakening to this natural and overdue realization, but it is not enough to counter decades of poison. At least not yet.
I mean, you can see the rapture in the faces of the youthful white crowds that crush to hang onto Obama’s every word, shake his hand and get his autograph. I daresay if he was Caucasian these same people wouldn’t give a flip about him. That’s because for decades – with more than enough predictions — the mass media has been preparing the world for a black U.S. president with motion pictures, sitcoms, music, documentaries, newspaper articles and reports depicting blacks as rugged, noble, resourceful heroes and European Americans (as a group) as weak-willed, conniving, greedy, and violent. So having failed to distinguish between media and reality the mostly young white supporters have long ago given in to engineered black idol worship, their consumption soaked brains unable to distinguish between visual memory that arrived via mass media and genuine social interactions. Never mind that he would be an utterly incompetent president because the press will do whatever it takes to guarantee an Obama victory. Reporters will write screeds entailing that an Obama victory is an obligatory phase on the road to Utopia and racial “equality.” After all hard-core Marxists dedicated to the destruction of Western culture have always used their infiltration of the American media as the best way to bring down our people’s nation. In other words the media’s goal is the hijacking of the very minds of these brainwashed white voters, that a black becoming the president will be the comeuppance of America’s so-called “racist past,” — in spite of the fact that millions of blacks who otherwise don’t care about politics will vote for Obama simply because he’s one of them. Additionally it seems no one in those crowds seems to be aware of the Black Nationalist church Obama attends, the Trinity United Church of Christ, whose sole mission is the advancement of other blacks only and their autonomist veneration for Mother Africa. “We are a congregation which is Unashamedly Black,” says their website. Even worse would be if those Obama cultists were aware of his affiliation with the church and didn’t care –which in my opinion may be a 50-50 proposition anyway. Then again, can you imagine the gnashing of teeth and rending of hair in the press and in the electorate if Mitt Romney’s church declared it was Unashamedly White?
Clearly then, the various groups and organizations who for decades worked under the “pro-white / white nationalist / race realist, or whatever-you-want-to call-it” banner, simply did not or could not awaken the right people at the right time in the right way on a national level. Were there exceptions? Well of course. But because of the omnipresent crush of the mass media and its contrived forms of peer pressure, the churches racial guilt peddling, the universities’ indoctrination sessions and the federal government’s lust for all things Third World, they failed to inspire to action the needed cadres of European Americans who could direct our nation on a course to racial and cultural cohesion. To take this difficulty of communicating with our people even further we need to look at John Young’s April 2007 broadcast entitled The New Activism, and I quote:
Dynamic Silence was invented by Rabbi Fineberg of the American Jewish Committee in 1947 as a method of closing off all access to the public media – and thus the larger culture – for people or organizations deemed to have an unacceptable point of view. In spite of minor changes and adaptations, it can still be understood as being comprised of two parts. In the first part, unfavored individuals are denied unmoderated exposure to the public. In the second part, only negative aspects of the unfavored individuals are reported. This starts a downward spiral of de-legitimization in the public eye in which the harder unfavored individuals try to get public exposure, the more negative and unflattering that exposure becomes until, finally, nobody wants to be associated with the ideas of beliefs of the unfavored individuals. Close quote.
Thus we have arrived at the Marxist’s dream, the nation-killer’s apex: Political Correctness incarnate. Barak Obama represents the Tan Everyman, the New American, the Global Citizen, the Totem of Tolerance, the Messiah of Miscegenation, and ultimately the vision that has been carefully inculcated in the minds of millions of European American. He is the final sacrifice of our racial identity at the alter of multiculturalism — not only for the alleged sins of our fathers but for the sins of our very genes. Today, European Americans have rejected the warnings of those who came before them –- regardless of the message or the messenger — that in order to preserve the facade of good race relations, they must repress their identity and kowtow to what blacks and other non-whites may think and say. With few exceptions there is now a general subservience in the thoughts our people articulate and the way we are to conduct ourselves in order to maintain a pretense of racial accord. The message seems to be that when a “person of color” is a politician, an actor, a boss, or assumes any other type of high profile position we are to keep our mouth shut, nod in harmony, and not even consider leveling criticism. Better yet, let’s make one of them president of the United States. In fact that’s why Barak Obama’s audiences seem to be so enthusiastic; they are happily obeying. As things stand at present, those of us who are troubled enough by pointing out that despite the benign outer manifestation of “equality”, “human rights”, “cheap labor,” “humanitarianism”, “tolerance”, and a mixture of other “–isms” we will continue to do what must be done on behalf of our people for no other reason than it’s the right thing to do. European American’s have the right to name, label and define themselves as is the right of the members of every other continental origin group in America, especially during this contentious election season.
As difficult as it may sound right now we ought to find a little support in this development. Yes, our people have ignored multiple warnings over multiple decades and we will see an expansion of Political Correctness like we’ve never seen before. A Barak Obama presidency would finally crystallize the idea in the general public’s mind that not only is there something wrong, but there has been something wrong for a very long time. A good portion of them will suddenly become conscious of the fact that they actually got what they wanted. Of course, they will be too ashamed to admit they allowed this to happen, especially when they experience the coming street level black empowerment of having a black president in the White House. But another percentage will want to make up for their politically correct appeasement on many fronts. They will want to undo the damage by whatever means necessary, by whatever is expedient for the situation at hand. So let us consider the formation of European Americans United in 2007 as the last best chance for the education and preservation of our people.
Remember: the best defense against the charge of racist is to call the person who says it a racist who displays hatred, feelings of supremacy and a willingness to smother the diversity of the white American people. And bear down on it — hard! The rise of a man like Barak Obama in the nation of our founders demands accountability and an aggressive posture based on common sense devoid of media manipulation. There is much to do and we need YOUR help.
European Americans United does not neccessarily endorse nor condemn the activity of past or present European American advocacy groups.