Part 2 — Black Disrespect for White Women

<o:p> </o:p>

Economic self-determination, once again, could significantly
benefit blacks. Whites, in turn, white women, in particular, have a right to be
protected against what violates them, and are under no obligation to suffer
under a politics of silence imposed in the name of the civil rights regime.
What is best for whites is not continued rape and sexual assault of white women
to the degree it now manifests. Rather, in so far as the protection of women,
human rights, and civilizational standards are at stake—and they are—the needs
of white women and white families—who, not black males, are the victims—have to
take precedence over the desire of blacks to participate in white economic
activity. With about 4,500,00 white females raped or sexually assaulted by black
males, too much damage has already been done and the threat of too much more
over time remains for the issue to be shackled by civil rights laws and
dissidents browbeaten by the harangues of civil rights ideology. These laws and
ideology in effect require white women to submit to black rape and assault.

<o:p> </o:p><o:p />

It might be possible to single out poor black males as the primary culprits in rape and sexual assault and therefore cordon whites off only from them, letting middle class black males be, but the high rate of black children born out of wedlock and raised in single-parent homes suggests a social condition that may not be bound by class. Further, dividing blacks in this way would undermine the potential for black solidarity and deprive lower-class blacks of the vital skills and leadership of the black middle class needed to establish a healthy black economy. Were a class division to occur, it would only benefit the white, Jewish, and other minority economies, who would take the best of the black economic crop for themselves. Tiger Woods as a Transcendent Man Once news started coming out about Tiger’s escapades, Richard Lapchick, director of the Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sports at the University of Central Florida, lamented, “It was just so far out of bounds with what anyone considers normal behavior.” He also commented, “I don’t know if there was anybody ever like Tiger Woods”. “We had an African-American athlete who totally transcended race…”. Aside from appearing to contradict itself (Tiger as both African-American and above race), Lapchick’s kind of thinking points to a much deeper confusion. Tiger’s public behavior, carefully edited for public consumption by the mass media to cut out his tantrums, foul language, and now, as we know, philandering, was presented as clean-cut and all-American, something anybody could like. Now that we know more about the real Tiger, this image of course now appears as a manufactured corporate product, more of a PR campaign than authentic. The issues go beyond that, however. At stake is whether Tiger—the well-behaved, multicultural man because of his diverse cultural inheritance—actually rose above race. Was he the transcendent man, a beacon to guide the rest of us above the imputed pettiness of our various cultural and racial origins? His behavior of course has now disqualified him from this appellation. Still, another Tiger with another name but of a similarly mixed background but better behavior could come along some day and reclaim this title unless the claims made of him are examined. The meaning of transcendence first has to be clarified. To the shills who constructed Tiger’s image (and to the ideologues with a stake in promoting multiculturalism), transcendence means nothing more than a human concoction of diverse cultural and racial backgrounds. They tried to make us believe that a concoction is transcendent because it is a concoction. In fact, however, nothing in the mere combination of ancestries indicates it will rise above those ancestries, as if, by magic perhaps, all the inherited traits of each of them disappear. If it fails to rise above those ancestries and merely expresses them in varying degrees, it is rather more of a transmission of the past in a more complex arrangement into the present. This is hardly the same, to offer a definition of transcendence closer to its original meaning, as “Surpassing others; preeminent or supreme,” or, to go to a deeper level, “Being above and independent of the material universe. Used of the Deity,” a state of being free from any limitations of inheritance and embodying eternal values with origins beyond space and time. Certainly less than divine, his behavior toward women, as statistics show, is not a type that expresses even the better values, and actually reflects tendencies most characteristic of specific subset of the black male population. Hardly transcendent except in his golf skills, Tiger roamed the world in order to take full advantage of it. The multicultural man, therefore, is no guarantee of the transcendent man, or even a prerequisite. He is a concoction or blend who may be able to combine traits from two or more cultures, but this combination may include negative as well as positive aspects and lack the truly transcendent personal qualities that come with exemplary behavior and timeless truths. Two plus two is still four (Tiger’s Asian, African American, American Indian, and Dutch ancestries), not infinity, though for the sake of argument we could say two plus two is a new “one” (the result of cultural and genetic synthesis like what has happened in Brazil), but this one is still not an infinite number, and a synthesis still has to be evaluated for its merits and demerits, never mind degree of transcendence. The claims of multiculturalism—Tiger as the embodiment of transcendence by birth alone—would seem to rest more in the realm of biological and cultural variation than any real concept of transcendence. Conclusion Last year’s torrent of revelations about Tiger Woods’ extramarital activities consistently portrayed his failings as the personal failings of a superbly gifted athlete. This conceptual isolation ignores certain questions, however: Primary among these is whether Tiger derived his extramarital propensities from any group of which he is a part. As suggested, professional golf seems to lack the charisma and magnetism of more exciting and proletarian sports that might engender cartloads of extramaritally active golfers. Ethnic and racial group statistics do begin to tell a relevant tale, however. Though Tiger is a multicultural man, the propensity toward infidelity is increased, compared to the rest of his background, including both Asian and white, in his African American heritage. The propensity toward other acts that violate women’s integrity in a fundamental way is also increased among the male members of this heritage, including rape and sexual assault, which belong with infidelity on a common continuum of mistreatment of women for purposes of sexual appropriation. Tiger’s African American background, in other words, makes it much more likely for him to engage in these kinds of acts than any other part of his heritage—nearly 15 times more likely than his white heritage when it comes to rape and sexual assault. As it is, he only committed infidelity, for which we can be thankful. Probability is of course not causality. At the same time, divorcing Tiger from the psychological and physical propensities he inherited in order to claim his failure was purely personal would appear to construct an artificially transcendent man above—like a god or saint—the inner forces and dynamics of his inheritance. Is Tiger a man outside time and free of the traits of his heritage and all those who have gone before him? Unlikely. Given the statistics, it is rather likely that his tendency toward infidelity was significantly reinforced by his African American male background and its penchant for the sexual appropriation of women, and that he gave in to that tendency. He did give in, a personal failure, and the mass media and capitalist system did provide him with the means (fame and money) to do this, but the physical and psychological forces within him necessary for his infidelity to occur most likely already existed in strengthened and more acute form because of his background. Tiger’s infidelity is only the tip of the African American iceberg when it comes to the mistreatment of females, and, as shown, black males are much more likely to mistreat white females than white males are. Far from just a celebrity story, the tale of the Tiger is indicative of a greater social pattern, a pattern that is longterm and potentially much more damaging than infidelity. Approximately 4,500,000 white females are the victims of black rape and sexual assault. Though infidelity alone would be an insufficient reason to take any far-reaching decisive steps, it does appear just to take action against rape and sexual assault for the sake of female safety and dignity, human values, and standards of civilization. The ongoing assaults on white females by black males, in other words, warrant action. (For those who are unconvinced by these statistics alone, looking also at black males’ overall crime rates, including murder and theft, might be more persuasive as a reason for separation.) Because workplaces and markets occupy so much of our time, adequate protection for white females might be attainable by whites taking control of their economic activity, laying down a cordon blanc, as it were, at economic borders with blacks. (A cordon blanc would be applicable in other conditions of decline as well, such as culture.) Whites and blacks would simply occupy much less of the same economic space, diminishing the chances of dangerous encounters. On the positive side for blacks, becoming economically independent of whites (and Jews and other minorities) has the potential to increase their wealth well beyond what it is today and restore some pride and family structure to their society. Ideally, intelligent blacks would see this as a sufficient reason to break away from domination by whites, Jews, and other minorities in most areas of life. If a positive reason is insufficient, however, whites should feel free and morally justified in becoming economically independent. Because this is post civil rights politics, how this will be done will likely involve significant social, academic, legal, and economic battles, the first of which conceptually is establishing the validity of defensive or prophylactic separatism as a political principle. The lives of millions of women and families, human values, and standards of civilization are at stake, and these are sufficient reasons to proceed. The Western spirit longs to break free of the chains applied by self-interested minorities, liberals, and Marxists, and implementing these measures would strike those chains with a powerful, perhaps fateful, blow. References Detroit News staff and wire reports. “Report: Tiger Woods cut deal to kill National Enquirer story,” The Detroit News, December 18, 2009, http://www.detnews.com/article/20091218/SPORTS04/912180436/1361/Report. ESPN.com news services. “Author: Woods at sex rehab clinic,” http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/news/story?id=4839414&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlines, January 19, 2010. Schriffen, Lisa. “Tiger, Barack, and the Law of Transitivity,” American Thinker, December 8, 2009, http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/tiger_barrack_and_the_law_of_t.html. Quiroga, Greg. “Tiger Woods fined by PGA Tour for taking a stand (for once),” Examiner.com, August 11, 2009, http://www.examiner.com/x-555-SF-Golf-Examiner~y2009m8d11-Tiger-Woods-fined-by-PGA-Tour-for-taking-a-stand-for-once. JRank.org. “Single-Parent Families – Demographic Trends,” no date, http://family.jrank.org/pages/1574/Single-Parent-Families-Demographic-Trends.html. Cantave, Cassandra and Harrison, Roderick. “Single Parent Families,” Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, August 2001, http://www.jointcenter.org/DB/factsheet/sigpatn.htm. Hymowitz, Kay S. “The Black Family: 40 Years of Lies,” City Journal, Summer 2005, http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_3_black_family.html. Treas, J & Gieden, D. “Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(1), pp. 48-60, 2000, cited at The Kinsey Institute, “Frequently Asked Sexuality Questions to the Kinsey Institute,” http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/FAQ.html#Treas. Kaniss, Phyllis. “Does Race Still Matter to African-American Children in Obama’s America?”, January 26, 2009, http://blog.aapss.org/index.cfm?CommentID=73. U.S. Department of Justice. “Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005 Statistical Tables,” Table 42, http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0505.pdf. Wikipedia. “Rape,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape. Wikipedia. “Race and crime in the United States,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States. Tjaden, Patricia and Thoennes, Nancy. “Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey,” National Institute of Justice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, November 1998, http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/172837.pdf. Dahlberg, Tim. “As sports scandals go, Tiger is tops,” Associated Press/Boston Herald, December 15, 2009, italics added, http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/columnists/view/20091215as_sports_sandals_go_tiger_is_tops/. Houghton Mifflin Company. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, 2009, cited at http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/transcendence. The author is a freelance writer and uses a nom de plume.

2010-01-26