Why is the push for unrestricted immigration focused so strongly and so specifically upon traditionally White nations?
THE OVERARCHING goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-whites into all traditionally white nations. Make no mistake — this is not mere coincidence. It is white genocide by design, worldwide in application. The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: white people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, and sometimes explicit in law, that they existed as white nations for the posterity of the white founding stock. All of these nations have had overwhelmingly white populations for the vast preponderance of their national history. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration. The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.
Why is the push for unrestricted immigration focused so strongly and so specifically upon the traditionally White nations?
Some say the traditionally White nations are economically advanced and therefore desirable destinations for immigration. This observation is mostly accurate. However, it does not explain the entire story because there are many other advanced nations that are traditionally non-White, yet face no pressure to absorb foreign populations.
Japan is one of the most highly advanced economies in the world. It is a well-known and well-documented fact that Japan faces a grave population decline. There are not enough young Japanese to assume the lower rungs of the workforce. A heavily elderly Japanese population looms on the horizon, destined to strain the retirement and pension system. The Japanese reproductive rate is far below the replacement rate. Over time, Japan’s population will continue its precipitous descent. Under the orthodox globalist economic doctrine, Japan’s situation beckons for a massive influx of cheap foreign labor. Yet somehow the international political discourse barely broaches the topic of massive non-Japanese immigration to Japan. There is no strong international or domestic pressure (or imperious demand) for Japan to import millions of Africans or South Americans. Japan is not singled out for genocide via massive non-Japanese immigration. Japan is not the target. Japan is free to remain Japanese. It is only White nations that are targeted for genocide.
Egalitarians claim “the race problem” will disappear if the traditionally White nations assimilate and interbreed with non-White populations. Some imagine this will produce a utopia of brown-skinned beauties — society “without race” by homogeneous default. Others recognize this scenario as the systematic eradication of the White race — White genocide.
To bolster the credibility of the latter position, put the shoe on the other foot. Assume for the sake of argument that in a stunning reversal, political correctness now dictates that Africans are “racist oppressors.” Africans disproportionately enjoy material niceties, unfairly subjugate other races, and an invisible “African privilege” pervades the air which mysteriously oppresses all other races. In this hypothetical world, “institutional racism” means that Africans are predisposed to success and worldly gain from birth, as a result of current political power relationships. Now, follow the usual prescription for healing with plans for coercive diversity and watch the fireworks begin!
The continent of Africa can solve “the race problem” by a massive influx of non-Africans. These non-Africans will assimilate and interbreed with Africans over time. The end result will be a utopia of mocha-skinned beauties — society without race by homogeneous default. Everyone will hold hands in unity, hatred will be a thing of the past, and racial oppression will no longer be an option.
A sharp mind quickly realizes that this “solution to the race problem” in the African example is actually the Final Solution for Africans. That is, the systematic eradication of the African people — African genocide. No rational Black man would agree with such a genocidal campaign. No reasonable Black man would stand by and cheer on the destruction of his or her fellow Africans. No race deserves genocide. Every race has the right to exist biologically, ethnically, and culturally.
International law defines genocide as an international crime against humanity, with grave punishment for violations. As far as the international recognition of the reality of race goes, ask the ghosts of Saddam Hussein or Wilhelm Frick if the Kurds or Jews, respectively, are mere social constructs. Race is an internationally-recognized reality and is a major factor in the crime of genocide. In the future, the political and economic elites that are responsible for the policies of White genocide may face trial before an international tribunal. The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
The present immigration and political policies of many traditionally White nations, especially the United States, are in violation of part (c) and possibly part (d). White nations have been subverted to conditions that heavily favor non-White immigration, restrict White birthrates, and encourage and support non-White birthrates, and are thus calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the White race. There are many quotations of politicians, professors, and pundits advocating this very point — the end of the White race. Genocide is not always an act of traditional murder. The United Nations Convention on Genocide covers violent genocide with parts (a) and (b). However, the remaining definitions cover indirect and incremental methods to clarify that any form of genocide is punishable under international law.
The United States employed an explicitly pro-White immigration policy for the entirety of its two centuries of existence — until the treasonous 1965 Immigration Act, which reversed the previous safeguards and subverted American immigration policy so it would henceforth discriminate against White Europeans. Prior to the 1965 Act, American immigration policy favored White European immigration for the explicit purpose of maintaining the racial status quo of the American population. The behind-the-scenes architects of the 1965 Act realized that overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration would inevitably reduce the White American population over time. The political front men of the 1965 Act, such as Ted Kennedy, falsely assured the American public that the new immigration policy would not upset the racial balance of America. In 1965, America was approximately 90 per cent. White. Just a few generations later, America is now about 65 per cent. White. In one more generation, White Americans will be a minority in their own country.
Illegal aliens create further demographic chaos, as White Americans are crowded out and out-bred by millions of Mestizo illegal aliens from Central and South America. Despite overwhelming public desire to seal the border and to deport and deny entry to illegal aliens, the federal government has willfully ignored its mandate to protect against all threats, foreign and domestic. Non-White legal immigrants and tens of millions of Mestizo illegal alien invaders will dispossess the White American majority in the next few decades. White Americans will become a minority in their own nation much faster than they would by legal immigration alone, even under the 1965 Act.
Overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration and millions of non-White illegal aliens are inherently destructive to the White American population. Welfare and social benefit policies financially reward the generally poorer non-White groups for having large numbers of children. Preferential hiring policies set aside jobs for non-Whites. Lax enforcement of employment law allows non-Whites to undercut the wages of White people. One appalling aspect of these trends is that most of these policies, such as welfare, food stamps, and free emergency medical care, are predominantly financed by Whites. White American taxpayers labor under conditions calculated to bring about their genocide as the progressive income tax discourages the most productive White Americans from having children.
Educated, self-reliant, and law-abiding White American taxpayers face the greatest disincentives to having large families. Instead, they work hard but are forced to financially support criminals, illegal aliens, and welfare abusers. The taxes paid by hardworking White citizens are transferred to illiterate illegal aliens and their “anchor babies” that will produce an ever-increasing number of welfare recipients and future criminals.
The White American population dwindles while the non-White populations exponentially increase, further straining the welfare system, crowding prison cells, diluting educational standards, and destroying formerly safe White neighborhoods. White Americans face incremental genocide by design, which is precisely why so many fail to recognize the creeping trend. Genocide need not be associated with machetes, firing squads, or executions. The type of genocide White Americans face is far more subtle — which makes it all the more dangerous.
To deny White citizens of White nations the right to preserve themselves — biologically, ethnically, and culturally — is a true example of racism and hatred. Genocide is never acceptable. What can be more “racist” than the systematic eradication of an entire race? White Americans need not be ashamed of identifying on a racial basis, as every other race in America has a political license to do so. La Raza, the League of United Latino American Citizens, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith are all bound by racial or ethnic ties.
White Americans are now approaching minority status in the nation their forefathers fought for and built from the ground up. If current birthrates continue, White Americans will be a tiny minority group in a few generations, in a completely unsustainable position. They will likely be unable to survive. White Americans must be free to object to the current policy of White genocide — and without being shouted down as “racists,” a term which is little more than a political tool to silence White advocacy.
If the denunciation of genocide rests upon the assumption that all races have the right to exist, why must the White citizens of traditionally White nations accept White genocide with open arms? It is defamatory and dishonest to slander any White person who objects to massive inflows of non-White immigration as a “racist.”
White people and White nations seem to be uniquely burdened with the “responsibility” of lethal self-sacrifice on a genocidal scale. The term “racist” is a thinly-veiled attempt to silence a person who wishes to protect his or her race from extinction — a person who opposes genocide.
White Americans must be free to describe racial injustices committed against White people. Introduce the term “anti-White” to mainstream political discourse in the only way possible — by starting with private conversation. The mainstream media attempts to mold public opinion, but when there is an seismic shift in American thought, the press has no choice but to bow to popular pressure. Demand an end to anti-White policies and White genocide.
White Americans have the same claims to identity, organization, advocacy, and existence as any other group in America. Take a principled, adamant, and vocal stand against White genocide. Talk to neighbors and inform friends. Write letters to editors, television producers, media figures, and especially politicians. Let the muffled White voice clear its throat and speak up clearly and forcefully after decades of silence. Turn the tables and take back the moral high ground. The truth is dangerous, which is precisely why slurs like “racist” are currently used to shout down reasonable opposition to White genocide. Brush aside such denunciations, or better yet, mount the offense with a counterattack.
Anyone who opposes a return to traditional American immigration policies is supporting White genocide. Anyone who supports amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens is enabling White genocide. The current American immigration policy discriminates against White Europeans and is bringing about White genocide. There is nothing more “racist” than genocide, because it is the destruction of an entire race. If someone shouts “racist!” in a petty attempt to silence debate, explain that a real racist is someone who wants to commit genocide against the entire White race. Stop White genocide — one conversation, one talking point, one letter, one complaint, one comment, one remark, and one person at a time. Stay on a consistent message against White genocide. The future of the White race, if there will be one, depends on you.
© 2011 Christian Miller