A critique of the treachery against British (and similarly American in this Editor’s opinion) society by pseudo intellectuals masquerading as leaders.
By David Morris — In his review of “The Memoirs of Granville Sharp” in The Edinburgh Review, “CapitalPunishments”, of July 1821, William Hazlitt rehearsed an anecdote aboutPrince Naimbanna: “If a man should try to kill me, or should try tosell me and my family for slaves, he would do an injury to as many ashe might kill or sell; but if any one takes away the character of Blackpeople, that man injures Black people all over the world; and when hehas once taken away their character, there is nothing that he may notdo to Black people ever after. That man, for instance, will beat Blackpeople and, and say “Oh, it is only a Black man, why should I not beathim?” That man will make slaves of Black people; for when he has takenaway their character, he will say,” Oh, they are only Black people, whyshould I not make them slaves?”
The word which is used to dehumanise usis “racists”, with today’s teacher trainees being told that “onlywhites can be racist.” It is not to make us slaves as the prince fearedfor his people, but is a way of excusing the importation of cheaplabour or allowing Muslims to take over our country.
In June 2000, Sir David Calvert-Smith,former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, did that which had soalarmed Prince Naimbanna. He “took away the character” of white peopleby describing nearly all white people as racist. He was head of the CPSfrom 1988 till 3rd November 2003 and is heavily responsible for turningthe police into a totalitarian force policing opinions instead ofcrime. In 2005 he led an inquiry for the Commission for Racial Equalityinto how the police forces of England and Wales dealt with racismwithin their ranks. The report on the inquiry was given in March 2005.At a press conference Calvert-Smith said they would not beinvestigating “racism” because it was a “given.” There his prejudicewas laid bare.
When the Establishment attack thosethey hate, they generalize, but when corruption is widespread amongstthe Establishment parties as with the expenses scandals, they treat itas an individual matter. Although it is clear that the expenses scandalaffects the parties as a whole, the media focus on individuals.
In an article entitled “Why Sir Ian Blair was right in his fight against racism,” in The First Post 3rdDecember 2008, novelist William Self repeated mindless ideology andslandered a whole people: “The outgoing Metropolitan Policecommissioner had the courage to call wider society out on its morerevolting prejudices … he confesses to regretting two or three thingsthat he said to the press, his infamous remarks concerning the Sohammurders are not among them. According to Blair, his contention that hecouldn’t see what ‘all the fuss was about’ — referring to the mediacircus that got going in the aftermath of Holly and Jessica’s deaths —is something he’s determined to stand by.
“What Blair meant by this — and he washappy to elaborate — was that a disproportionate amount of attentionwas paid to these particular murders because the victims were young,white girl children, while the media are considerably less exercised bythe death of young, black males.”
Has Self not heard of Stephen Lawrenceor Damilola Taylor? Well, more than he has Kriss Donald. When it comesto the unfashionable issues, these writers talk in mindless clichés. There is no creativity, no pushing back boundaries when it comes to theEstablishment ideology, just robotic repetition.
As for Blair — you would expect thatsort of talk from a psychopath who would have an excuse, but thesemedia elites have none. Ian Huntley’s murder of two young girls is notas bad as the imaginary prejudice against ethnics by whites! The elitesare prejudiced against whites but that is not “disgusting”? PoliceChief Colin Cramphorn once said concerning Muslim child-rape of youngwhite girls that we must learn to live with it! These comments show theunderlying hatred the elites have for white people.
The Telegraph of 10th November2008 shows how these base minded people prop each other up. Sir IanBlair will receive a pay-off worth up to £400,000 when he stands downas Metropolitan Police Commissioner in three weeks’ time. Theadditional sum is on top of the estimated £3.5 million pension pot,worth £160,000 a year, which he is set to receive after 30 years’service as a policeman.
The traditional elites: the Archbishopof Canterbury, Judge Butler-Sloss and Stephan Hickman, QC, are callingfor the introduction of Sharia Law. Consider that we’re told that Islamis a ‘Religion of Peace’ — both Tony Blair and Boris Johnson haveasserted as much. If you care about the future for women under Islam inthe west look up The Despatches programme filmed inside mosques.
A sick judge sentenced Stuart Wood,with previous convictions for violence and indecent assault on younggirls, to just seven years for a vicious rape, then praised him forconverting to Islam: “You have turned to Islam and this promises wellfor your future, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religionwhich respects women and self-discipline.”
Under Sharia Law, rape can only beproven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses.Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having beenwitnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are takenas confessing to having sex.
A consequence of the Macpherson Reportis the reduction in legal protection for those under suspicion.Ostensibly, the repeal of Double Jeopardy in 2005 followed a marathoncampaign by Ann Ming after her daughter was murdered in 1989. This wasa convenient case to use because the removal of Double Jeopardy was arecommendation of the Macpherson Report into the murder of StephenLawrence and would enable the state to repeatedly try “racists” untilthey can get a conviction.
Many Labour ministers have extremistlinks and pasts but the media cover that up. If the media had wanted,they could have exposed Labour, but because they share the sameidealogy, they did not. Don’t blindly trust the media but questionevery statement and look things up for yourselves in search engines.
The Times, in 1954, givesevidence that even then we were being cleansed from our communities.There were 200 a month arriving without work or accommodation which wascausing concern in London, Liverpool and Birmingham.
“On Merseyside, where 121 disembarkedon Tuesday from the liner Ascania, there is a coloured population ofabout 10,000. It is estimated that 2,000 of them are receiving publicassistance … all the Government departments concerned say they have nomeans of assessing how many of the immigrants from the West Indies andto a small extent from the African colonies, are drawing welfareallowances. This is because all the immigrants are recorded as Britishsubjects, and have equal claims.”
When public figures make the usualbiased pronouncements on us and racial issues, research their hiddenagendas. On Radio Four, Simon Hughes stated that they would have tostart exposing the BNP’s argument such as exploding their ‘myth’ thatasylum seekers get new houses, etc. He claimed this was not true. Notonly is it true, but ‘asylum seekers’ get massively preferentialtreatment. Hughes was deceiving the public and behind his apparentlyreasonable words wants to submit us to Islam.
Andrew Marr tells us what he thinksshould be done to Britons if we object to being dispossessed: “Onlypeople who understand the economic forces changing their world,threatening them but also creating new opportunities, have a chance ofbeing immune to the old tribal chants.
“And the final answer, frankly, is thevigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be myPresbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be agreat, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain ‘natural’beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off. The policeare first in line to be burdened further, but a new Race Relations Actwill impose the will of the state on millions of other lives too.”
So it should — but not merely on thepolice, or the boys with spray-paint cans. The present bunch of elitesare the most selfish crowd of beggars on horseback ever to attaininfluence. They browbeat ordinary people into leading the moral lifethey themselves advocate but avoid living. Marr is advocating fascismand “ethnocide.”
Where do Paxman and Andrews Neill andMarr live? Not in the middle of Southall or Brixton! Sometimes they dowhen they are young like Billy Bragg but when it comes to bringingtheir children up they move to nice areas.