Thinking About ‘White Nationalism’ – Western Voices World News

It would behoove us to reflect on what it is about our people that require our enemies to be so vigilant.<a href=”http://www.westernvoices.com/audio/frank_roman/2nationalist.mp3″>Audio Version</a>by Frank RomanWell, it seems the troglodytes over at the Southern Poverty Law Center have finally gotten around to including our organization, EAU, onto their infamous ‘hate map.’ <a href=”http://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/hate.jsp#s=CA”>(hXXp://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/hate.jsp#s=CA</a>)This so-called hate map is supposed to display the continental whereabouts of alleged racist haters. You know who they are; they’re the Luftwaffe combined with a couple of rural white guys in bib overalls all rolled into one, a really ugly package. Yeah, that’s them. In recent years the SPLC’s definition of hate has come to include anyone with a website and a PO Box whose politics lean right of Ted Kennedy. This hate map lists garden variety Neo Nazis, Klansmen, conservatives, pagans, and immigration revisionists (as I like to call them) complete with contact information and their location for interested parties to join, such as bored FBI agents. It also includes a category of “hate” known as ‘white nationalist,’ the designation European Americans United now occupies within the hallowed halls of <a href=”http://www.americanpatrol.com/SPLC/ChurchofMorrisDees001100.html" target=”_blank”>Morris Dee’s church.</a> So, now that EAU and its members have been bestowed with that label by those “in the know,” I’d like to talk about that description with you today.Understandably, the first question from someone would be something like: what would a white nationalist United States look like? Well, that’s a good question and I do want to give it a shot in a few minutes. But for now let’s examine our new white nationalist label. First of all EAU’s philosophy is more along the lines of racially-aware Constitutionalists. Though we don’t like making comparisons to the NAACP and similar ethnic advocacy organizations, EAU does speak out for the ethnic interests of a particular demographic; our methods and aims are above-board and diplomatic. In fact as it says on our organizational web page: “We are persons of European ancestry from every walk of life: scientists, mechanics, farmers, lawyers, engineers and full-time parents. While we come from every class and creed, we are united in our pursuit of European American interests including freedom, genetic continuity, social justice, economic nationalism and environmental protection. In pursuit of these goals, we seek to educate those of our people who are not aware of important issues facing us, and help to organize effective activism for those of our people who wish to take a hand in positive change.” Now if that is what a ‘white nationalist’ designation is supposed to represent then fine, we’ll take it but with reservations. I’m not to keen with the nationalist end of the label which we allegedly share with, according to the SPLC, black nationalists, specifically the Nation of Islam. In my opinion they are black supremacists inasmuch as LaRaza and MEChA are brown supremacists. And in case you hadn’t noticed, our friends over at the SPLC don’t list them as haters of anything at all. On the other hand, while they decry ‘white supremacism’ they seem to have a difficult time describing the actions of non-whites working on behalf of their group interests, often violently, as supremacists of any kind. Federal and corporate dollars going into those groups’ coffers will do that, you know. And never mind the fact that most so-called white supremacists simply work to promote separate living space and political independence from policies that favor non-white influence. This still seems to qualify as supremacism. Therefore, because EAU and similar groups do not blatantly sport frightening images, espouse bloody rhetoric or engage in apocalyptic racial fantasies; because we are sober active white Americans then the SPLC had no choice but to think that we, by default, consider ourselves to be white nationalists while hiding a supremacist ulterior motive. Is that how it works? Certainly, the manner in which even the most benign activists are attacked by these so-called ‘watch dog’ groups belie more is at work in their fevered brains than political disagreement. Now, this is not to say our people don’t breathe the same air as some really dangerous cranks who espouse things like non-white genocide and mass murder. EAU has nothing whatsoever to do with them.Again, enemies to white nationalism insinuate that white nationalists are actually white supremacists with functioning gas chambers in their basements. They believe that white nationalists are actually lying about preserving white heritage; that a white nationalist’s ultimate plans lie in upheaval and bloodshed over their estrangement by the rise of liberalism, open borders, an overall downturn of culture and loss of identity. So I guess anyone can call themselves ‘white nationalists,’ or white supremacists, even when they moderately attempt to organize and address things like racial preferences in the workplace or supporting a welfare state for Mexicans (and blacks) by paying a large portion of the costs without any direct cost benefit. Thankfully though, we can sense that a growing number of European Americans are beginning to believe that they can never give enough to satisfy non-white “claims,” and that’s a good thing. Ultimately, the only rational course of action will be to disconnect ourselves from them. While that kind of remedy can easily be categorized as a separatist or nationalist position, I have actually seen some of the more influential ‘anti-racists’ in our midst tag even this proposition as white supremacist!White supremacy? Where? But let us assume our enemies and their lackeys are 100% correct when they say that white nationalism is really white supremacism, that it’s a real and deadly threat to a multicultural America. Alright then, I have a question for these mewling bed wetters: where is it? Where is this so-called white supremacism? Have you seen it? Have THEY seen it? (Please don’t tell me they’re referring to a gaggle of misfits that play dress up, or beat up innocent people.) Only the most blind or self deceiving dolt hasn’t seen how relentless, universal misinformation has made us ashamed of our character and our customs; insisting through the media and the courts that our diverse accomplishments as a distinct race actually belong to the entire world and we have to “share.” In reality we “white supremacists disguised as white nationalists” seem to be too scared to organize for our common good as non-whites and others do; who are not only encouraged but are heavily funded as well. Additionally, white people in America and around the world are race-mixing and aborting themselves out of existence while allowing record Third World immigration into our white ancestral homelands. Does all of that sound like white supremacy? If you recall in early 2007 (and possibly sometime soon in 2008!), the street demonstrations of millions of mestizos across America bore a simple message: ‘We call for your rights! We claim your jobs! We want your women! We demand your future! If you don’t hand us America then you are racist Nazis!’ So where was the massive so called white supremacist back lash to these swarthy demonstrators as they waved their Mexican and American flags while proclaiming their phony allegiance to the “American Dream?” Where was the white resistance to this clear and present danger against our posterity? With the exception of a few letters to the editor I didn’t see it. Did you? How supreme is that, my friends? Look, while we should snub direct or oblique labels toward us as being supremacists in the form of nationalists, it would behoove us to consider what it is about our people that requires our enemies to be so vigilant. Why, it might actually be flattering! But we won’t ever really know until we have a self-motivated social and political machine in place — and we had better get on the stick. At any rate tagging a group like EAU with the label white nationalist, or ANY label of the SPLC’s choosing is merely a way to marginalize our sensible message because in the long term it may upset the status quo for those who directly benefit from a squabbling (multicultural), consumer driven society.So what would a white nationalist America look like?Okay’ let’s take a stab at it: what would a white nationalist America look like? First, let me say the batteries in my crystal ball need to be changed and I can’t read the future at this time. Nor am I a civics expert. But I think we can extrapolate from <a href=”http://www.europeanamericansunited.org/" target=”_blank”>EAU’s basic positions and moderate tone </a>what a nation under the authority of a white advocacy government might actually look like. Off hand the integration and destruction of the founding race would simply have to stop since our declining numbers can’t take much more. Corruption of the law would be considered abhorrent and abortion would have to stop being the equivalent of a trip to the dentist. Foreign wars would be pointless since a white nationalist government would keep its nose out of everyone else business. Save for the discovery of an imminent threat to our safety as a people, invading a sovereign nation would be a last resort. Leaders whose sole aim in life is the pursuit of wealth and influence to the detriment of everyone else will have been effectively neutralized by law & the proper instruction of ethics; based not on class or creed, but instead on moral character and personal achievement. And finally, the traditional family unit would be the cornerstone upon which all else was derived. Okay, so let’s try to get a little more specific.Immigration: Because a white nationalist government supports the self-determination and preservation of all races and peoples one of the first things our government would do is hermetically seal our borders. Since the preservation of our genes and our lands is undoubtedly in our best interest, and theirs, the border between the United States, Mexico and Canada would bristle with manpower to prevent any more incursions. While turning away the oncoming interlopers from the south—and really, everywhere else — inwardly our administration would empty the jails and prisons of non-white criminals, and humanely deport them. To supplement this action a public campaign would be kicked in, encouraging the rest to go back to their homelands, to make the necessary improvements they want over there. A WN USA would also make it as uncomfortable as possible in terms of employment and public assistance for them to even want to stay here. Now, would there be exceptions? Well of course there would. But once that was accomplished our administration would endeavor to collect from the government of Mexico — and the southern hemisphere — all of the billions of dollars the American taxpayer lost by subsidizing the public assistance, healthcare and education during their stay. Finally, we would negotiate among ourselves a return to pre-1965 immigration laws when nearly all immigration was from Europe.Now this is not to say foreigners would never be allowed to temporarily enter and work in the United States. But –they would only be admitted according to their potential of contributing to OUR national progress. Immigration officials would first guarantee that immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their provisions and for their dependents. Foreigners WILL be barred from the country if their presence upsets the stability of the national demographics, or when they are considered negative to economic or national interests, when they do not act like good citizens in their own country, or when they have broken American laws, and when they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy. Out they go. In fact a WN USA will have the option of suspending or outright prohibiting the admission of foreigners when it determines it to be in the national interest. Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, will most definitely be imprisoned. Economy: Since our nation was founded on values coupling personal endeavor with joint co-operation, European Americans have demonstrated over the years that we all are better off when we adhere to fundamental standards of social justice and free enterprise. This is to say the federal government would simply get out of everyones way and allow the citizens to create and maintain the kind of economy only the best and brightest can create, including amiable trade policies with ALL other nations. Therefore, the muckety mucks that brought us <a href=”http://www.sweetliberty.org/nafta_gatt.htm" target=”_blank”>NAFTA, GATT, the WTO</a>, the <a href=”http://www.apfn.org/APFN/fed_reserve.htm”>Federal Reserve and the IRS</a> would have much to answer for because those organizations, which do not have our people’s best interests at heart, would be gone overnight. In my opinion the best tax system to replace the punishing graduated tax code we are now forced to endure through “voluntary compliance” would be the <a href=”http://www.fair-tax.org/" target=”_blank”>Fair Tax</a>, or something akin to it, which ensures people keep all of what they earn while funding the government on the retail side. Dog-eat-dog global economics that has resulted in off shoring, outsourcing, the destruction of unions, and the gutting of the US economy would be outlawed, but would also be backed with accommodating incentives for corporations to participate in our nation’s natural destiny. We would promote economic nationalism, which places the economy at the service of the nation because we believe that the welfare of our people should supplant all other things, including the capacity of multinational corporations to abuse or disregard our people for uninhibited profit margins. As far as international trade is concerned, the United States would trade freely with anyone who wished to do business, provided it didn’t minimize or harm our own manufacturing base.Environment: Corporate interests have more often than not damaged our environment and this egregious practice would come to a grinding screeching halt. Our over-reliance on foreign oil, which has harmed our foreign policy, would be replaced with environmentally “friendly” drilling and the exploration of our own oil, natural gas and the appropriation of technology that further minimizes the byproducts of using coal. We would work to emulate France, which has more nuclear reactors than anyone else, and a WN government would build as many of its own safe and reliable nuclear reactors as possible to power the economy; thus keeping the charge of use affordable. It would do what was possible to stabilize man’s relationship with the natural world. For example, a mass public relations program encouraging – not demanding – more telecommuting to keep as many vehicles as possible off the roads; the development of better mass transit, and the healthy utilization of unused (reclaimed) <a href=”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownfield_land" target=”_blank”>“brown fields”</a> such as for orchards and root crops; allowing people to plant and raise what they wished to not only feed their families but financially support themselves and their local economies. Heavier penalties than we see today would be imposed on those whose careless ambivalence about our natural environment has claimed untold injury to the land, air and water. Likewise, a white nationalist government, which values the diversity of all races, would lobby strenuously for the ethical treatment of domestic and wild animals; the preservation of scarce and vulnerable species, and the maintaining of their diversity. Freedom: Having examined the greatest successes of European peoples; we believe that our greatest growth and achievements (Greece, Rome and the U.S. up until the 1930’s) have always been under Republican rather than Socialist forms of government. So instead of turning to dictatorship, we turn to Thomas Jefferson. In essence, Jefferson conceived of a purely European-derived nation in which individuals (bound to the community’s wellbeing through morality) had wide latitude of action; while government could not be misused to benefit some people at the expense of others because its sphere of action was limited. Obviously, the vision of Jefferson, Washington, Madison and Jay was perverted; almost from the very start, by a snake in the grass known as Alexander Hamilton. Furthermore, like any government structure Republics DO have limitations of scale, and may only achieve their desired outcomes with a wholly European population… as it was intended. Clearly, some fine-tuning of the concept is required to make it workable and we have found that fine-tuning in the ongoing work of the <a href=”http://www.new-right.org/?p=57" target=”_blank”>European New Right. </a>But this is where our political philosophy lies — in a perfection of the U.S. Constitution combined with the defense and improvement of our folk. An honest re-assessment of the original Bill of Rights would include a passionate public undertaking at all stages of education and public discourse. A white nationalist government would essentially be religion neutral and people would be free to worship, or not worship, as they wished. But — threats to traditional, hard-won freedoms—especially freedom of speech and the right to keep and bear arms – would be relentlessly protected. No man would have to fear an early morning raid on his home by<a href=”http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=/SpecialReports/archive/200602/SPE20060217a.html" target=”_blank”> jack-booted agents</a> of the state, or threatened with loss of livelihood, for simply questioning a government policy. The vast spying capabilities of the US government would not undermine the people’s peace of mind, but would only be utilized after the most scrutinizing investigation. Political correctness on college campuses would be a thing of the past, a relic of dark days, through a renewed effort of inculcating in our young people the learning of real history in an <a href=”http://www.europeanamericansunited.org/school1/" target=”_blank”>inspiring truthful context</a>. Again, we would call for a return to the vision of the Founding Fathers: a vision that values the rights of our people to dissent and to live according to their natural inclinations.Race: Thomas Jefferson warned us that, while the African slaves would have to to be freed, that once emancipation had occurred they would need their own country separate from ours if we expected to be equally free. "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people [blacks are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them." –Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:72Because of the so-called “civil rights” movement an ever increasing number of white Americans are beginning to see that it was only they who were supposed to give up any sense of racial solidarity. However, a white nationalist government would support self-determination for all races and peoples domestically AND around the world. It would also allow European Americans to decide where they wish to live and enforce a right to decide how they will live, provided their choice does not cause an undue financial or social burden on the rest. But, knowing that a stem to stern wholly white America is not realistic, in certain regions a domestic geographic separation would be necessary for the preservation of all unique cultures and ethnics; allowing the natural proclivities of every race to live among their own kind. While some of our more antagonistic yet weaker listeners will be horrified at such a proposal, consider this: (Quoting John Young): “Over the past forty years, our government and dozens of private organizations have tried to put things right in a variety of ways — generous scholarship programs, head start, affirmative action, early intervention and the investment of untold trillions of dollars. Yet, after all of this effort, the living conditions of the average black child are actually worse than they were 40 years ago. Back in 1960, one-fifth of black children were born out of wedlock; whereas today, it is more than half. There can be no more telling example of a policy that not merely fails to achieve its stated objectives, but makes matters materially worse, and at a terrible cost in terms of human misery. Think about that a second. Living under an ostentatiously apartheid system that regarded them as less-than-human, where blacks had their own schools, their own colleges, their own churches, their own social structures and so forth – blacks had stronger marriages, lower crime and in many cases higher academic achievement than they do today. African-Americans didn’t somehow become less intelligent today than they were 80 years ago. IQ scores are not the explanation. European-Americans didn’t somehow become more "racist" than we were 80 years ago — if anything, we have become way less racist. The major change that occurred was INTEGRATING blacks into white culture.” Therefore, the quest for the concept of racial equality would be declared a search for the lowest common denominator as demonstrated today. When man’s perceptions are unhindered by alien or caustic influences, especially from a media whose sole aim is to promote shallowness, political correctness and consumption, a media that would be wholly reigned in without compunction, the pursuit of equality may then be regarded as the destruction of quality. A white nationalist government’s primary concern would be what most benefits the diversity of European Americans as a people, and the preservation of their genes and their lands is undoubtedly in everyone’s best interest. By “celebrating diversity” they be will be celebrating not only their own improvement but their rising numbers, influence, and undreamed of possibilities for the future.That’s the best I can come up with as far as what a white nationalist United States would look like. Rather than sending off our best and brightest to fight and die for a United Corporations of America or a Global Empire of America a white nationalist America would above all else seek peaceful co-existence with other nations, so long as they did not threaten the organic destiny of our people. But there is still much to do to achieve this worthy goal. Far and wide the <a href=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ULLZm_x_YE&feature=related”>Marxist elite</a> educate our children that to defend our genetic and historical legacy is the very depiction of evil; while assisting in the long term goals of the non-white segments of society and the world is righteous and good. The end result, if trends continue, will be not only the genocide of European derived people but the genocide of all races through conflict, miscegenation and loss of identity. However, the way it looks now its going to take what the Southern Poverty Law Center calls a ‘white nationalist’ group to prevent this kind of violence, a violence they themselves have openly promoted for decades.

2008-04-27