Shadow Play – Western Voices World News

mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
</style>
<![endif–>

Better late
than never. <o:p />

By Frank
Roman <o:p />

<o:p><a href=”http://www.westernvoices.com/audio/frank_roman/shadow.mp3″>Audio
Version</a></o:p> <o:p><a href=”http://www.westernvoices.com/audio/frank_roman/shadow.mp3″></a><o:p /></o:p>

If you
haven’t already listened to fellow board member and friend John Young’s newest
podcast entitled <a href=”http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=5683″>The Endless Bailout </a>I strongly advise that you do. If
you’re like me the recent national economic tempest can be rather confusing –and
more than a little abstract– in terms of money-making policy, cause and
effect, and even short term versus long term consequences.  In fact, although we’ve already posted
numerous accounts of this story, there is still so much information in nearly every
aspect of the so-called mortgage crisis –and the federal bailout via the
taxpayer’s money– of lending institutions, it’s almost crucial for an
untrained layman to listen to The Endless Bailout. It puts everything
pertaining to the federal government, banking and consumer behavior into perspective,
and straightens out the labyrinth of double-talk into fluid easy to understand
documentation. <o:p />

Things
certainly do look bad right now in the financial quarters of our once great
nation. The omnipresent 24 hour news cycle, coupled with an agonizingly long
presidential election, has enveloped everything, at least in my world, in a
straitjacket of droning opinion and analysis from media mavens who work for
outrageous salaries in addition to ratings for their commercial laden, opinion
shaping networks. From Keith Olberman to Sean Hannity I’m sick of all of them. But
there is good news out there today–very good news. The upside is that it portends
yet another manifestation of a kind of initiative in people of European
descent. The downside is that the story I’m talking about originated overseas,
not in the United States, so don’t look for it to share the front page of any
Americans newspaper anytime soon. Be that as it may however, this story is not confusing or as technical as the
current meltdown on Wall Street because it’s something either a pallid physicist
or a suntanned bricklayer can easily comprehend — wherever they may live. <o:p />

The
September 27th issue of The Guardian, the UK’s (United Kingdom) most
liberal bedwetting newspaper carried the following headline: <a href=”http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/sep/27/polls.conservatives1" style=”font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;”>Multicultural
ideal ‘terrible’ for UK – Tories</a>. (In case you don’t know the Tories are
the British version of our neoconservative Republicans.) It seems that the <a href=”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominic_Grieve" style=”font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;”>shadow home secretary,
Dominic Grieve</a>, was issuing a warning, the same kind of warning that many
of our listeners and supporters of EAU and other sensible organizations have
been saying for decades. Allow me to read a few portions of The Guardian report.<o:p style=”font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;” />

“But Grieve today ventures into the
sensitive subject of multiculturalism in some of the strongest remarks by a
Tory in recent times. He tells the Guardian: "We’ve actually done
something terrible to ourselves in Britain. In the name of trying to prepare people
for some new multicultural society we’ve encouraged people, particularly the
sort of long-term inhabitants, to say ‘well your cultural background isn’t
really very important’." He adds: "In this vacuum the <a href=”http://www.bnp.org.uk/”>BNP</a> rises and <a href=”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hizb_ut-Tahrir”>Hizb ut-Tahrir</a><a href=”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hizb_ut-Tahrir”> </a>rises.
They’re two very similar phenomena of people who are experiencing a form of
cultural despair about themselves, their identity. And it’s terribly easy to
latch on to confrontational and aggressive variants of their cultural
background as being the only way to sort of reassure themselves that they can
survive and have an identity." The shadow home secretary said
multiculturalism was inspired by the "understandable" desire to make
people feel comfortable. But he added: "The idea behind it was [to create
the melting pot. But the melting pot needs the ingredients of people’s
confidence in themselves as they come together. And if it isn’t there I think
we’ve done ourselves huge damage." <o:p />

Of course,
Mr. Grieve is implying that was it not for differing races having that pesky
inclination toward something akin to Nature-programmed self realization, why
there is no reason at all that enforced multiculturalism should not work. And
too, chances are good that shadow home secretary Dominic Grieve would sooner
allow Muslims to realize their full racial identity –in Britain where else?–
rather than indigenous white Britons, at least according to the vast majority
of British politicians and bureaucrats like former Prime Minister Tony Blair, whom
we have featured here at Western Voices World News, BNP haters one and all, in every
single one of their impudent glory.  Mr.
Grieve continues:<o:p />

“‘He also raises fears that "fundamental Islam"
is restricting debate.  He says: "Our
country has adapted because people have been tolerant which has often required
a lot of forbearance and acceptance of things they didn’t like. We all have to
accept things we don’t like. That is how Britain has evolved. When I go and
address an Islamic audience I always point this out."<o:p />

Ah yes, that fine old moniker — tolerance. Government enforced tolerance in a multicultural
colony, I think we can say with certainty the Muslim population that is
overtaking the island of our British cousins could care less how adamantly Mr.
Grieve tells them that it required a lot of forbearance and acceptance of
things the British people didn’t like, such as the escalation of Muslim crime,
gang rapes, and death threats in the political arena. And then there’s the
prosecution and jailing of politically incorrect white dissidents who publicly
decry what the institutional Marxists have done to Britain. I would hardly call
that evolution, though. De-evolution certainly, but categorically not evolution.
<o:p />

“An Anglican, Grieve praises the contribution all the
major religions have made to Britain. But he says that people should not forget
Britain’s Christian heritage. He says:"The role of Christianity is really
rather important. It can’t just be magicked out of the script. It colours many
of the fundamental viewpoints of British people, including many who’ve never been
in a church."<o:p />

Well isn’t that remarkable. Maybe the loss of exquisitely
British standards and religion –with the embrace of all things degenerate–
have led to indigenous British youth who would rather worship at the feet of the
drug addled, anti-racist pervert known as <a href=”http://www.virginmedia.com/microsites/celebrity/slideshow/pete-doherty/img_1.jpg”>Peter Doughtery</a> rather than heed
the lessons of common sense– including political and historical examples. Maybe
the loss of exquisitely British standards and their religion –by way of the
politically correct stifling of debate Mr. Grieve’s colleagues have allowed for
decades– is what have turned the once mighty Anglican Church into a virtual burial
chamber and her parishioners into scattered, shambling ghosts of a once mighty
people.<o:p />

Now, I didn’t tell you what shadow minister Grieve said
in the very first paragraph of his interview with The Guardian. He said: “Multiculturalism in
the UK has left a "terrible" legacy, creating a vacuum that has been
filled by extremists from across the political spectrum.” By way of ambivalence
I think Mr. Grieve is really saying the current British oligarchy is not far
from having their rear ends handed to them by more and more people who are
taking a second look at the British National Party, are taking a second look at
the policies that have led to their current situation, if not taking a second
look their own history by reappraising their British identity. You know — extremists. I like to think the shadow
minister may have to find a shadow to hide in because he senses those who are
sick unto death over what the impudent lawmakers and socialist nabobs have done
to the United Kingdom is reaching a boiling point.  Of course whenever you hear a political
functionary use the term “extremist” he is more often than not talking about
white people – advocates and activists of all stripes who have sworn to do what
must be done to raise the consciousness of their brethren to the oncoming
demographic sand storm. And Muslims are not extremists, they are simply
misunderstood; isn’t that right Mr. Grieve? To hold close foreign cultures at the
expense of your own is not only extremist in every sense of the word, it is intellectual
suicide which leads to genocide of the host population, isn’t that right Mr.
Grieve?<o:p />

Overall, I
found this piece to be very encouraging for what we here at European Americans United
and many of the UK’s people know to be true. In fact I’m surprised it ever went
to print. Maybe the Marxists over at The Guardian bunker felt they could damage
the co-called “conservatives” by smearing them with a few high profile candid
remarks Grieve made in a candid fit of contrition or absolution for what he has
allowed to happen to his kinsmen. In fact we have to wonder how long and to what
depth shadow home secretary Grieve has been nursing these thoughts, yet
remained silent. That possibility alone tells us he is acquiring much he will
have to account for. Soon. But no matter. The perception of certainty in every
responsible white man and woman, who stand against those elements on different
levels in the current system(s) that is marginalizing our people, is growing.
Thanks to the World Wide Web this confession –of sorts– has been transmitted
all over the planet and could not have come at a better time. <o:p />

Better
late than never is what I say, Mr. Grieve.<o:p />

2008-09-27