This is what it looks like when the Cultural Marxists, who mold students’ minds, are afraid their “lessons” will be exposed to the reality of sunlight. They know any comparatively young person is unable to appreciate how far we’ve sunk and to know from that just what we’ve lost, and what must be recaptured.
Professors across the country are taking to social media to express their concern over being forced to deliver their course lectures online amid the coronavirus outbreak, sharing with each other tips on how to limit the number of people who are able to see what they’re teaching students, and criticizing “right wing sites” and even Campus Reform, specifically.
(Although we believe Campus Reform is a politically correct paper tiger, they nevertheless reveal some truly outrageous conduct committed by leftist ‘professors.’ Credit due. –ed)
Texas Christian University Associate Professor of Political Science Emily Farris tweeted Thursday, “if you are recording a lecture on anything controversial, be prepared for right wing sites to ask students to share it.” Campus Reform reached out to Farris via Twitter Direct Messaging to allow her the opportunity to further explain her comments or to clarify. She later blocked the author of this article on Twitter.
LaSalle University Assistant Professor of Public Health Christen Rexing replied to Farris’ tweet, asking why others could find topics such as “gun safety, women’s health, elections, etc.” to be “controversial, as they are “evidence-based.”“Seems like the flood gates could open,” Rexing commented in response to courses moving online.
University of North Carolina political science graduate student Stephanie Shady also weighed in, saying, “Annnnd I just realized that the second half of my course focuses on public opinion towards and politicization of immigration. This will be interesting.” Another user with the Twitter name “Prof CWO” replied “Sigh, I teach about white nationalism and this has been my biggest fear since we began transitioning to online instruction.”
(UPDATE: We at Western Voices World News strongly encourage any and all students to share their professors lectures with us at the Submit News link.)
======
LaSalle University Assistant Professor of Public Health Christen Rexing replied to Farris’ tweet, asking why others could find topics such as “gun safety, women’s health, elections, etc.” to be “controversial, as they are “evidence-based.”
What a strange statement; like the author has been vacationing on another planet for the past few decades. The three things he specified aren’t “evidence based” because they’re all “code”—they don’t say what they mean. To the Left, “gun safety” means “gun elimination”; “women’s health” means “abortion”; and “elections” means “voter fraud”. The first step in dealing with reality is acknowledging what it is. The popularity of “code” in politics is a way to avoid this. A great deal of government policy is directed toward dealing with problems which are really different problems than stated. “Evidence” simply doesn’t enter into it.