In the meantime they are well protected by the same kind of wall we need on the southern border as their fellow tribesmen in the media and academia call for more ‘refugees’ to be shipped here. The mask of these vile bipeds slipped off a long time ago.
We keep hearing about moderate dialogue in dealing with Muslims and their Jewish cousins. Moderate dialogue over an extreme act of social engineering and treason? We shouldn’t have to explain why we take issue with liberals’ use of the word moderate because it should be self – evident. If you are a member of the White West and you still cannot see what has been done to our people racially and culturally then what kind of demented tone deaf creature are you? Imported values that are alien to our culture usually come as a result of imported alien racial and cultural groups, and if you can’t see that then you are beyond help and deserving of retribution from those of us who know better.
====
It is not simply American invasion policy which has been driven by Jews, but the invasion polities of all White nations.
From Kevin MacDonald’s The Culture of Critique:
Jewish Chronicle, the principle Jewish newspaper in England, opposed restriction on Commonwealth immigration in an editorial in the October 20, 1961 edition (p. 20). The editorial noted that Jews perceived the 1905 legislation as directed against them and stated, “all restrictions on immigration are in principle retrogressive steps, particularly for this country, and a disappointment to those throughout the world who would like to see the limitations on the freedom of movement reduced rather than increased. The issue is one of moral principle.”
During the 1970s the Conservative Party opposed immigration into Britain because, in the words of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Britain was in danger of being “swamped” by peoples who lacked “fundamental British characteristics” (Alderman 1983, 148). Conservative politicians attempted to obtain Jewish support on this issue, but the anti-immigration policy was condemned by official Jewish organizations, including the Board of Deputies, on the basis that “Since all British Jews are, or are descended from, immigrant, it was unethical—even immoral, for a Jew to support immigration control, or at least tighter immigration control” (Alderman 1983, 148-149). (In its editorial of February 24, 1978 [p. 22] the Jewish Chronicle supported a non-restrictionist immigration policy, but was careful to avoid framing the issue as a Jewish issue, presumably because a Conservative Jewish Minister of Parliament, Keith Joseph, had appealed to Jews as Jews to support restriction. The Chronicle was most concerned to deny the existence of a Jewish vote.) Jews who did support the government policy did so out of fear that increased immigration would lead to a fascist backlash and therefore increased anti-Semitism.
In the case of Canada, Abella (1990, 234-235) notes the important contribution of Jews in bringing about a multicultural Canada and, in particular, in lobbying for more liberal immigration policies. Reflecting this attitude, Arthur Roebuck, attorney general of Ontario, was greeted “with thunderous applause” at a 1935 convention for the Zionist Organization of Canada when he stated that he looked “forward to the time when our economic conditions will be less severe than they are today and when we may open wide the gates, throw down the restrictions and make of Canada a Mecca for all the oppressed peoples of the world” (in M. Brown 1987, 256).