…The real distinctions which nature has made, and many other circumstances will divide us into parties and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race.”–Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia Q.XIV, 1782. ME 2:192
For the past fifty years, our politicians have ignored our interests and served every master with a fat wallet. The scope of our freedom has declined in every measurable way — laws trying to criminalize thought, laws restricting free speech, restrictions on the right of self-defense and wholesale destruction of the precious Bill of Rights under the guise of necessity. Our tax dollars flow overseas to enrich or prop up a variety of regimes while our own people remain hungry for opportunity.
But it doesn’t have to be like this. Anything that can go wrong can be put right! European Americans United is devoted to informing our people about the issues facing them today and organizing effective issues-oriented activism that will create a brighter future for our children. Join with us and see how bright the future can be!
On January 12 2006, the following letter was sent to Tim Weyenberg, board chair for the Green Bay Area Chamber of Commerce by Tim Nixon, Diversity Council Co-Chair, Godfrey & Kahn.
Because of the egregious deceptions contained in this public document as it pertains to European Americans, and the national ongoing perpetuation of the myths of so-called diversity, European Americans United contacted Tim Nixon, Time Weyenburg and Paul Jadin to express our concern. A copy of our refutation was also sent to the Green Bay Gazette newspaper. Our main purpose for this action is to bring this particular issue before as many people as possible in Green bay WI and elsewhere; to display with clarity the ongoing marginalization of unawakened European Americans.
Tim Weyenberg, Chairman of the Board
Green Bay Area Chamber of Commerce
c/o Foth and Van Dyke
P.O. Box 19012
Green Bay, WI 54307-9012
Dear Tim:
We read your republished letter by Tim Nixon with considerable interest, but were dismayed by your decision to consider it in such a positive light without refutation of so many of its ridiculous points based upon flawed premises. We expect better critical thinking skills from lawyers.
Now that our Congress is considering granting amnesty to as many as 20 million illegal aliens (and the businesses who broke dozens of State and Federal laws to “employ” them), we believe the time is right to give you our own opinion on the matter regardless of the outcome.
European Americans United is an ethnic advocacy group that focuses on the long-range best interests of European-Americans, just as the NAACP works to advance the interests of African-Americans and the Anti-Defamation League advances the interests of Jewish-Americans, Israeli lobbyists and so forth. Our philosophical perspective is based on the thought of America’s founding fathers – Jefferson, Madison, Washington et al. – as modified by the thought of European New-Right philosophers like Tomislav Sunic and Alain de Benoist. As such, we have very specific views about “diversity,” nationhood, immigration, economics and related matters.
We dispute Mr. Nixon’s and your uncritical acceptance of the notion of America as an “idea” nation. While America was founded on specific ideals – just like Colombia (whose Constitution is based on ours) or the U.S.S.R. (whose ideals didn’t work out so well) – those ideals were specifically tailored to match the temperament of a particular People.
John Jay pointed this out in Federalist #2: “With equal pleasure I have often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people – a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs …”
This is hardly an argument for “diversity.” Rather, it is an argument that the IDEALS of America can only be realized with a highly homogenous population, and that diversity is not a strength but a weakness. George Washington and our entire first Congress clearly shared his opinion, as the first immigration law they passed restricted immigration to persons of European ancestry ONLY. You cannot dispute this because it is a fact.
This concept of an “idea-nation” is Frankfurt School claptrap that lawyers, at least, should be smart enough to recognize as such.
Furthermore, many honest sociologists and evolutionary psychologists have demonstrated that homogenous population groups demonstrate more altruism and other beneficial characteristics that make nations run more smoothly.
We also dispute the implicit acceptance of a Dickensian England view of economics, in which a vast unskilled and low-paid workforce is viewed as essential to economic progress. This view was thoroughly discredited, to England’s great pain, through a lack of technological progress and the creation of a Marxist-dominated unionized workforce that likewise opposed progress. This served to diminish England from a once-great world power into an also-ran. Meanwhile, the United States abolished its slave class and Henry Ford actually doubled the pay of his assembly line workers. The simple fact is that fair wages spur innovation. We do not require a Mexican-style workforce. Rather, we require a workforce that is constantly improving in quality. This is what made America an economic powerhouse. Trying to compete with Chinese child labor as your correspondent suggests is utter madness. Emulation of lowest common denominator labor ideals from China is as un-American as you can get.
We likewise dispute the equating of Italians — who are European and kin to Leonardo DaVinci — with Mexicans, whose native Indian culture has seldom risen above subsistence farming and making beads. Mr. Nixon equates Italians with Mexicans as though Mexicans, Haitians and Italians make, or would make, equally valuable contributions to our culture. If Haitians make such great cultural contributions – why not live there for six months so you can benefit from their wonderful culture? Of course, you probably wouldn’t survive the experience because Haitians don’t welcome “diversity” in their homeland. Go and actually LOOK at Mexico; the real Mexico away from the resorts and talk about what Americans can learn from them other than the consequences of poor sanitation.
We are sick unto death of this invalid equation of Italians with Mexicans.
Folks with a clue aren’t buying it. They know the difference between great opera and childishly decorated pottery. So advancing this sort of nonsensical argument makes people wonder whether you are being deliberately deceptive, or just plain stupid.
But even assuming your correspondent were correct about these things – an incorrect assumption – we’d like to ask “diversity” poodles such as yourself and Mr. Nixon how many more Third World aliens we should import into the land of our fathers. It seems that Africa, Japan, and China for example, don’t need “diversity,” but places like the United States and Britain most certainly do. Why that double standard?
There are roughly 105 million Mexicans, many with little or no education, living in poverty, and carrying diseases we had once eradicated in America. Would it be all right for all 105 million of them to join the 20 million-plus already here? There are about 14 million Guatemalans in the same condition as their Mexican counterparts. Should we allow them all into America with open arms, too? There are 7 million people in Honduras, and 8.5 million in El Salvador. Would it be “immoral” to fail to send them an invitation and a ticket to Anytown, USA?
And that’s just Central America. How about the rest of the world? How many of India’s 1 billion people — Communist China’s 1.3 billion — and how many from Africa and the Middle East are we supposed to welcome here legally and illegally? When will the “diversity” poodles and their string pullers be satisfied? You know the answer. Never. They won’t be satisfied until we are wiped out and replaced.
In any other circumstance in Asia, Africa or the Middle East, importing an alien and unrelated population to displace the inhabitants would justly be called “genocide” — the greatest crime that can ever be committed. Well, it is also genocide in THIS case. The United States was founded by Europeans and was intended from its creation to be a nation of European-derived people. Importing an alien population to displace the European-Americans is a textbook case of genocide, pure and simple.
We at European Americans United want to point out this fact so that the hateful nature of your advocacies and its effects are known and exposed to the light of day. We also hope you will reconsider your flawed premises, and adopt a philosophical system consistent with freedom and self determination for ALL people, including European-Americans.
Very truly,
The European Americans United Board of Directors
Drago Rendl
Frank Roman
John Young
==